COURSE INTRODUCTION AND APPLICATION INFORMATION


Course Name
Structural Design
Code
Semester
Theory
(hour/week)
Application/Lab
(hour/week)
Local Credits
ECTS
ARCH 304
Fall/Spring
2
2
3
4
Prerequisites
None
Course Language
English
Course Type
Elective
Course Level
First Cycle
Mode of Delivery -
Teaching Methods and Techniques of the Course
Course Coordinator -
Course Lecturer(s)
Assistant(s) -
Course Objectives The students who succeeded in this course will be able to compare cons and pros between building structure mainly LEED/USA, partially BREEAM /GB and BEP/TR certification systems.
Learning Outcomes The students who succeeded in this course;
  • Will be able to discuss and compare/contrast how our buildings can create a healthier more sustainable future with LEED, Bream and BEP.
  • Will be able to learn associated classification of green building practices, as well as mainly the LEED credit rating systems and reference guides.
  • Will be able to describe how LEED provides a framework for healthy, highly efficient, and cost-saving green buildings.
  • Will be able to evaluate a knowledge associated with the basic of green design, construction and operation
  • Will be able to explain the principles of an environmentally and socially responsible, healthy, and prosperous environment that improves the quality of life.
Course Description The course will be focusing on mainly LEED/USA,1998 (Leadership in energy and environmental Design) Green Building Design and Construction Certification Systems. It delivers a comprehensive framework for green building design, construction, operations and performance, partially BREEAM /GB 1997 (Building Research Establishment Environmental Assessment Method) and BEP/TR. 2010 (Building Energy Performance)
Related Sustainable Development Goals

 



Course Category

Core Courses
Major Area Courses
X
Supportive Courses
Media and Managment Skills Courses
Transferable Skill Courses

 

WEEKLY SUBJECTS AND RELATED PREPARATION STUDIES

Week Subjects Required Materials
1 Introduction No preparation
2 Versions: LEED Rating Systems https://www.usgbc.org/leed/rating-systems/new-buildings
3 LEED v4.1 Building Design +Construction; New Construction and Major Renovation, Core and Shell Development, Schools, Retail, Data Center,Warehouse and Distribution Centers, Hospitality, Healthcare. Updates on Standards LEED v4.1 BD+C guide, LEED v4.1 BD+C rating system LEED v4.1 BD+C rating system tracked changes LEED v4.1 BD+C credit overview LEED v4.1 BD+C scorecard LEED credit library
4 LEED Project Types 1 BD+C Building Design and Construction https://www.usgbc.org/resources/leed-v4-building-design-and-construction-current-version
5 LEED Project Types 2 ID+C Interior Design and Construction Commercial, Retail and Hospitality LEED v4 ID+C rating system PDF / LEED v4 ID+C scorecard / Reference guide overview
6 LEED Project Types 3 O+M Building Operations and Maintenance Existing Building LEED v4 ID+C rating system PDF / LEED v4 ID+C scorecard / Reference guide overview
7 Term Project Review; Analysis
8 LEED Project Types 4 ND Neighborhood Development LEED v4 ID+C rating system PDF / LEED v4 ID+C scorecard / Reference guide overview
9 LEED Project Types 5 Homes Multifamily Lowrise Multifamily Midrise LEED v4 ID+C rating system PDF / LEED v4 ID+C scorecard / Reference guide overview
10 LEED Project Types 6 Cities and Communities LEED for Cities Pilot scorecard / Guide to LEED Certification: Cities and Communities Pilot
11 LEED Recertification https://www.usgbc.org/resources/recertification-guidance-leed-buildings
12 LEED Zero LEED Zero Carbon LEED Zero resources (Energy, Water, Waste) https://www.usgbc.org/programs/leed-zero https://true.gbci.org/
13 LEED Certified Project Examples https://www.usgbc.org/projects
14 BREEAM /GB https://www.breeam.com/ https://www.bregroup.com/expertise/
15 BEP/TR Building Energy Performance http://www.bep.gov.tr/
16 Term Project Review; Synthesis
Course Notes/Textbooks
  • Edward Allen, Joseph Iano, Fundamentals of Building Construction Materials and Construction John Wiley  and Sons Inc.– USA, 2002
  • Edward Allen, Joseph Iano, The Architects Studio  Companion John Wiley and Sons.Inc.– USA, 2006
  • Walter T. Grondzik, Alison G. Kwok, Benjamin. Stein, .John S. Reynolds, Mechanical and Electrical Equipment for  Buildings. John Wiley and Sons.Inc.– ABD, 2010
Suggested Readings/Materials

https://www.usgbc.org/

https://www.breeam.com/
http://www.bep.gov.tr/

https://www.usgbc.org/leed/rating-systems/new-buildings

LEED v4.1 BD+C guide,

LEED v4.1 BD+C rating system

LEED v4.1 BD+C rating system tracked changes

LEED v4.1 BD+C credit overview

LEED v4.1 BD+C scorecard

LEED credit library
https://www.usgbc.org/resources/leed-v4-building-design-and-construction-current-version

LEED v4 ID+C rating system PDF / LEED v4 ID+C scorecard / Reference guide overview
LEED v4 O+M rating system PDF / LEED v4 O+M scorecard / Reference guide overview

LEED v4 ND rating system PDF / LEED v4 ND scorecard / Reference guide overview
LEED for Cities Pilot scorecard / Guide to LEED Certification: Cities and Communities Pilot

https://www.usgbc.org/resources/recertification-guidance-leed-buildings

https://www.usgbc.org/programs/leed-zero

https://true.gbci.org/

https://www.usgbc.org/projects
https://www.breeam.com/
https://www.bregroup.com/expertise/

http://www.bep.gov.tr/

 

EVALUATION SYSTEM

Semester Activities Number Weigthing
Participation
1
10
Laboratory / Application
Field Work
Quizzes / Studio Critiques
2
20
Portfolio
Homework / Assignments
Presentation / Jury
1
30
Project
1
40
Seminar / Workshop
Oral Exam
Midterm
Final Exam
Total

Weighting of Semester Activities on the Final Grade
4
100
Weighting of End-of-Semester Activities on the Final Grade
Total

ECTS / WORKLOAD TABLE

Semester Activities Number Duration (Hours) Workload
Course Hours
(Including exam week: 16 x total hours)
16
2
32
Laboratory / Application Hours
(Including exam week: 16 x total hours)
16
Study Hours Out of Class
16
2
32
Field Work
Quizzes / Studio Critiques
2
6
Portfolio
Homework / Assignments
Presentation / Jury
1
10
Project
1
24
Seminar / Workshop
Oral Exam
Midterms
Final Exams
    Total
110

 

COURSE LEARNING OUTCOMES AND PROGRAM QUALIFICATIONS RELATIONSHIP

#
Program Competencies/Outcomes
* Contribution Level
1
2
3
4
5
1

To be able to offer a professional level of architectural services.

X
2

To be able to take on responsibility as an individual and as a team member to solve complex problems in the practice of design and construction.

X
3

To be able to understand methods to collaborate and coordinate with other disciplines in providing project delivery services.

 

X
4

To be able to understand, interpret, and evaluate methods, concepts, and theories in architecture emerging from both research and practice.

X
5

To be able to develop environmentally and socially responsible architectural strategies at multiple scales. 

X
6

To be able to develop a critical understanding of historical traditions, global culture and diversity in the production of the built environment.

X
7

To be able to apply theoretical and technical knowledge in construction materials, products, components, and assemblies based on their performance within building systems.

X
8

To be able to present architectural ideas and proposals in visual, written, and oral form through using contemporary computer-based information and communication technologies and media.

X
9

To be able to demonstrate a critical evaluation of acquired knowledge and skills to diagnose individual educational needs and direct self-education skills for developing solutions to architectural problems and design execution.

X
10

To be able to take the initiative for continuous knowledge update and education as well as demonstrate a lifelong learning approach in the field of Architecture.

X
11

To be able to collect data in the areas of Architecture and communicate with colleagues in a foreign language ("European Language Portfolio Global Scale", Level B1)

X
12

To be able to speak a second foreign at a medium level of fluency efficiently.

13

To be able to relate the knowledge accumulated throughout the human history to their field of expertise. 

X

*1 Lowest, 2 Low, 3 Average, 4 High, 5 Highest